Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-11-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.62 x 2.97 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.13 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Glacier Green and Stellar Blue |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Moto G200 5G is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A50, having an 86.2 score against 83.8. Although Moto G200 5G is extremely newer than Samsung Galaxy A50, it is heavier and thicker. Moto G200 5G has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Moto G200 5G also has a higher amount of RAM.
Motorola Moto G200 5G has a screen that is just as good as the screen in Galaxy A50, because although the Motorola Moto G200 5G has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a quite bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2460 pixels. The Galaxy A50 features a lot bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola Moto G200 5G, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
Moto G200 5G has a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low light photography, it also counts with a camera with a lot better resolution and a lot better (4K) video resolution. The Moto G200 5G has greater battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.