Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-01-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 2.91 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Meteorite Black and Pearl Gold |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G85 MT6769Z (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Moto G41, having a general score of 83.8 against 79.1. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an a lot older phone than Moto G41, but Samsung could make it a little thinner and a little lighter anyway. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G41. They have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Moto G41 has a screen that is very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A50 one, and although the Moto G41 has a little more pixels per display inch and a bit higher 1080 x 2400px resolution, they both have a same size screen. Moto G41 has a bit bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto G41 also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G41 features better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% greater battery size. Moto G41 takes a little bit better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same video resolution, the same video frame rates and the same aperture, the Moto G41 also has a camera in the back with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.