Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-12-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.71 x 3.01 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aqua Blue, Bright Silver and Indigo Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Moto G51 5G, with an 83.8 score against 77.8. The Galaxy A50 body is notably lighter and thinner than the Moto G51 5G, despite of the fact that it was released many years before. Galaxy A50 has a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G51 5G. Both of them have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 features a slightly better display than Motorola Moto G51 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a little better pixels density. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much greater memory to install games and applications than Moto G51 5G, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity.
Moto G51 5G shoots better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing images and videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution, the Moto G51 5G also counts with a much higher 50 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and higher video frame rate.
The Moto G51 5G has greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.