Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.94 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Dynamic Grey and Frosted Champagne |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 732G SM7150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2230 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (360 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Moto G60's 79.5 global score. Even though the Samsung Galaxy A50 is notably older than Moto G60, it's body is incredibly lighter and noticeably thinner. Motorola Moto G60 counts with a processor that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A50 one, both have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy A50 has a bit better display than Motorola Moto G60, because although it has a little bit smaller display and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a quite greater number of pixels per inch of screen. Galaxy A50 features slightly more storage capacity for apps and games than Moto G60, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory.
Moto G60 features a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega pixels back facing camera and a much higher 3840x2160 video definition. Moto G60 has a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.