Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.68 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Iced Mint and Ink Blue |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio G95 MT6785V/CD chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2050 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G76 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the Moto G60s's score of 79.9. The Galaxy A50 is a extremely thinner and notably lighter cellphone than the Moto G60s. The Galaxy A50 has a little bit better performance than Moto G60s. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better looking display than Motorola Moto G60s, because although it has a little smaller screen and a little worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density. The Moto G60s counts with a little bit better memory to install applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory capacity, the Moto G60s also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Motorola Moto G60s shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola Moto G60s also has a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution back camera. Moto G60s has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.