Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.23 x 2.99 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cosmic blue and Crystal pink |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 14.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Moto G8 Plus, getting a global score of 83.8 against 77.6. The Galaxy A50 design is somewhat thinner and somewhat lighter than the Moto G8 Plus, even though both of them were released only a few months apart. Galaxy A50 counts with a little faster CPU than Motorola Moto G8 Plus. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM.
The Galaxy A50 features just a bit better screen than Moto G8 Plus, because it has a slightly higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, a bit higher pixel density and a bit bigger screen. The Moto G8 Plus shoots much better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the Moto G8 Plus also has a lot larger camera sensor, a way better video definition and a back-facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Moto G8 Plus, and although they both have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola Moto G8 Plus counts with a battery lifetime that's very similar to Galaxy A50's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.