Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Capri blue and Smoke black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 237.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is better than Moto G8 Power, with a score of 83.8 against 76. Even though Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than Moto G8 Power, it's construction is thinner and somewhat lighter. Galaxy A50 has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto G8 Power. They have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM memory amount.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid screen than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a just a little greater amount of pixels in each screen inch and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2340. The Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage to install games and applications than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A50 also has more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better camera than Moto G8 Power, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates, a same size camera sensor, a F1.7 aperture and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with way more megapixels. The Moto G8 Power counts with better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the Motorola Moto G8 Power.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.