Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Marshmallow Blue, Midnight Blue and Viva Magenta |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | -- |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Moto G84's 80.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a incredibly heavier phone than the Moto G84, but both of them are equally thin. The Galaxy A50 counts with a really superior performance than Moto G84, although it has 8 GB less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
Moto G84 features a sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, a little larger display and a little bit better number of pixels in each screen inch. Galaxy A50 features a little bit more memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Moto G84, because although it has just 128 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Moto G84 counts with a superior camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures and video, and they both have the same video quality, the Motorola Moto G84 also counts with better 60 fps video frame rate, a much more MP back facing camera and a lot bigger back camera sensor providing a lot higher image quality.
The Moto G84 has improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.