Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-09-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.69 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blush gold and Navy blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Moto G9 Plus's global score of 80.5. Galaxy A50's design is lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, although it was released just a little more than a year before. Galaxy A50 features a little bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto G9 Plus, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater pixels count in each inch in the screen.
Galaxy A50 features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G9 Plus. Both of them have 8 processing cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. Moto G9 Plus features a superior camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures, it also counts with a much higher resolution back-facing camera, a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photographs and a way better 3840x2160 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Moto G9 Plus count with extremely similar memory to store more games and applications, both of them have a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and equal internal memory. The Moto G9 Plus counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.