Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-12-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.78 x 3.02 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Electric violet and Metallic sage |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1640 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 263 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Moto G9 Power's score of 78.6. Although the Galaxy A50 is older than Moto G9 Power, it's construction is a lot lighter and a lot thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little faster CPU than Moto G9 Power. Both have the same RAM amount and 8 cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a brighter display than Moto G9 Power, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per display inch and a lot better 1080 x 2340 resolution. Moto G9 Power features as much memory to install games and applications as the Galaxy A50, they have a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage.
Moto G9 Power counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light captures, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition, the Moto G9 Power also counts with a back facing camera with way more mega pixels and faster video frame rate.
Motorola Moto G9 Power has a much better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 6000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.