Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, with a global score of 83.8 against 76.4. The Galaxy A50 design is notably newer, but just a bit heavier and just a little thicker than the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition. The Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater pixels density.
Galaxy A50 counts with a little faster processing unit than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a greater number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better pictures and videos than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have the same video frame rate and the same video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a camera with a higher 25 megapixels resolution.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition counts with a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit superior battery performance than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 14 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.