Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Moto Z2 Force Edition's score of 77.4. The Galaxy A50 construction is newer, but heavier and notably thicker than the Moto Z2 Force Edition. Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
Moto Z2 Force Edition counts with a bit better CPU than Galaxy A50. They have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core CPU. The Moto Z2 Force Edition has a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has 0 less internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior battery life than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rates, the Galaxy A50 also has a larger diafragm aperture to capture better photos and videos in low light environments, a way more mega pixels camera and a larger camera sensor capturing higher quality videos and pictures.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.