Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Motorola Moto Z3 Play's overall score of 76.3. Even being the best cellphone we compare here, the Samsung Galaxy A50 construction is a little bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. Galaxy A50 counts with a slightly better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a little bit higher screen pixel density, a little bit bigger display and a quite better 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Moto Z3 Play has slightly more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy A50, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little better processing power than Moto Z3 Play. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Galaxy A50 takes just a bit better photos and videos than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking worse quality images, and they both have the same diafragm aperture, the same video frame rate and the same video quality, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a way more mega pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A50 has improved battery life than Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 33% larger battery size.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones in our comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.