Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Oxford blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Motorola One 5G is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A50, with an 84.6 score against 83.8. Motorola One 5G's body is newer than the Samsung Galaxy A50's, but it's heavier and thicker. Galaxy A50 and Motorola One 5G both count with similar screens, although the Motorola One 5G also has a little bit bigger display, a just a little more pixels per inch of display and a little bit higher 1080 x 2520px resolution.
The Motorola One 5G features a CPU that is very similar to Galaxy A50's processing unit, they have a 4 GB RAM and 8 processing cores. Motorola One 5G features a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola One 5G also has a much larger sensor, a much higher video resolution and a back camera with a much higher resolution.
The Motorola One 5G counts with a bit bigger storage to install applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal internal memory capacity, the Motorola One 5G also has a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 1000 GB. Motorola One 5G counts with greater battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Motorola One 5G is a better device, it costs a lot more than Samsung Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A50. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy Motorola One 5G, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy A50, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.