Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LTPS |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is a bit better than Motorola One 5G Ace's general score of 81.6. Despite of the fact that Samsung Galaxy A50 is older than Motorola One 5G Ace, it's construction is notably lighter and thinner. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid screen than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a bit smaller display and a little bit lower 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a just a little greater display pixel density.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and 8 processing cores. The Motorola One 5G Ace takes a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher video resolution.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more memory capacity for apps and games than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a SD card slot that holds 512 GB smaller, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage capacity. The Motorola One 5G Ace counts with superior battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.