Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the Motorola One Action, with an 83.8 score against 78.5. Although Galaxy A50 and Motorola One Action were only released 5 months apart, Galaxy A50 is somewhat thinner and a bit lighter. The Motorola One Action has a little bit better looking screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a bit higher 1080 x 2520 pixels resolution and a little better display density.
The Galaxy A50 has just a little better processing power than Motorola One Action. They have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a slightly better camera than Motorola One Action, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a camera with a lot higher resolution and a bigger camera aperture for better low light photos and videos.
The Motorola One Action counts with a slightly better memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Action also has a slot for SD memory cards that supports a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Action, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.