Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola One Hyper's score of 79.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body is lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper, even when both were released only a few months apart. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better performance than Motorola One Hyper. They have a Octa-Core processing unit and the same RAM amount.
Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have the same resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Galaxy A50 also counts with a quite greater pixel count in each screen inch. The Motorola One Hyper features a little bit better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Motorola One Hyper also has a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 1000 GB.
The Motorola One Hyper and Galaxy A50 have really similar battery durations. Motorola One Hyper has a much better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos, it also counts with a back camera with way more mega pixels and a lot higher 3840x2160 video quality.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.