Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue and Brown |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Motorola One Vision, with an 83.8 score against 80.7. Galaxy A50 is a somewhat thinner and a little bit lighter cellphone than Motorola One Vision, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart. Motorola One Vision features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a just a little better screen pixels density and a slightly better 1080 x 2520 resolution.
Motorola One Vision has as much storage for applications, games, photos and videos as Samsung Galaxy A50, they have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB and the same internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit superior processor than Motorola One Vision. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3500mAh. Motorola One Vision counts with a superior camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Motorola One Vision also has a way better (4K) video resolution, a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality pictures and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.