Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Motorola One Zoom, with an 83.8 score against 80. The Galaxy A50 is a lighter and thinner device than the Motorola One Zoom, even though both were released with only a couple months difference. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the same pixel density and a screen with the same size. Motorola One Zoom captures better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Motorola One Zoom also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a way higher 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has an external SD slot that supports up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A50 and Motorola One Zoom both have similar batteries duration.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing here, Samsung Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.