Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2020) has an overall score of 87, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy A50's general score of 83.8. Motorola razr (2020)'s construction is newer than Samsung Galaxy A50's, but it is somewhat heavier and just a bit thicker. The Galaxy A50 features a bit more vivid display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a little bigger display, a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a just a little greater display pixels density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 features a little bit more memory for games and applications than Motorola razr (2020), because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The Motorola razr (2020) counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2020) features a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the Motorola razr (2020) also has a much bigger camera sensor capturing much higher quality photos, a way better 3840x2160 video resolution and a way higher 48 mega pixels resolution camera.
Galaxy A50 has a much better battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4000mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Although Motorola razr (2020) is a better device, it costs a lot more than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Galaxy A50. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Motorola razr (2020), otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Galaxy A50, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.