Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than the Motorola razr (2022), getting a score of 83.8 against 81.1. The Galaxy A50 body has the same thickness than the Motorola razr (2022), but it is somewhat lighter. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a little faster processor than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Motorola razr (2022) also has more RAM memory.
The Motorola razr (2022) has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a slightly higher 1080 x 2400 pixels resolution. Galaxy A50 has a much better memory for applications and games than Motorola razr (2022), and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 has just a little better battery life than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity. The Motorola razr (2022) features just a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not favorable for taking photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a much better video quality and a lot more mega-pixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.