Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 15 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | -- |
| Super AMOLED | LTPO |
| 403 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025)'s 79.2 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a little smaller screen. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a lot better performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has 12 GB lesser RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has longer battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 4700mAh of battery capacity. Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has a superior camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot higher 50 MP resolution back camera and a much better video quality.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.