Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-03-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.25 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Carbon Black |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1200 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 SM8475 (4 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a general score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than Motorola ThinkPhone's 78.9 global score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an much older cellphone than the Motorola ThinkPhone, but it's lighter and just a little bit thinner anyway. Motorola ThinkPhone features a bit better screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a little worse pixels density, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels.
Galaxy A50 has a very superior processing power than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with more cpu cores. The Galaxy A50 has a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Motorola ThinkPhone, because although it has only 128 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola ThinkPhone has a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for low light images and videos, it also counts with a lot larger sensor and a camera in the back with a much better resolution. Motorola ThinkPhone counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.