Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-09-23 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 8.01 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Polar night |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a global score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than Nokia 8.3 5G's 80.5 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than the Nokia 8.3 5G, but Samsung managed to build it way lighter and somewhat thinner anyway. The Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid screen than Nokia 8.3 5G, because although it has a little smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a little bit better count of pixels per inch in the display.
Nokia 8.3 5G and Samsung Galaxy A50 both have quite similar storage for applications, games, photos and videos, they have an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB and the same 128 GB internal storage. The Nokia 8.3 5G features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Nokia 8.3 5G also has a larger amount of RAM.
Nokia 8.3 5G and Samsung Galaxy A50 have really similar cameras, because although the Nokia 8.3 5G has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a bigger back-facing camera sensor which offers a better image and video quality, a lot higher resolution camera and a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
The Nokia 8.3 5G has a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.