Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, with a score of 83.8 against 80.3. Samsung Galaxy A50's construction is incredibly lighter and thinner than the Nokia 8 V 5G UW, even though it was released a bit more over a year before. Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a processing unit that is very similar to the processing unit in Galaxy A50, and although the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a greater amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A50 features a slightly better display than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a quite smaller display and a bit worse resolution of 1080 x 2340, it also counts with a just a little higher pixels amount per inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 features just a bit bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB against 1000 GB, it also counts with 64 GB more internal storage.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW captures much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography, it also counts with a much better 3840x2160 video resolution, a way higher resolution camera and a lot larger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Galaxy A50 not only is the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.