Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-11-09 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.75 x 3.14 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.65 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Midnight Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | -- |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 8.36 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4470mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Nokia X100, with a score of 83.8 against 77.3. Samsung Galaxy A50 is an older cellphone than Nokia X100, but Samsung could make it incredibly lighter and somewhat thinner. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with just a bit better processing power than Nokia X100, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
Galaxy A50 features a slightly better screen than Nokia X100, because although it has a little smaller screen and a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2340px, it also counts with a quite higher pixels amount per inch of screen. The Galaxy A50 captures greater videos and photos than Nokia X100, although it has a lot worse resolution camera.
The Nokia X100 counts with a bit more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Nokia X100 also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1 TB. Nokia X100 counts with a bit better battery duration than Galaxy A50, because it has a 12% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.