Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | -- |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a bit better than Nokia XR20, with a overall score of 83.8 against 80.8. Although Galaxy A50 is way older than Nokia XR20, it's construction is noticeably thinner and way lighter. Nokia XR20 features a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a slightly higher 1080 x 2400px resolution and a bit larger screen.
Galaxy A50 has a bit more powerful processing unit than Nokia XR20, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Nokia XR20 features a slightly better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same video resolution, the Nokia XR20 also counts with higher video frame rates, a much more mega-pixels camera and a bigger sensor capturing better quality photographs.
Nokia XR20's memory to store more games and applications is very similar to Samsung Galaxy A50's one, both of them have a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and equal 128 GB internal memory. The Nokia XR20 has a little longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 16 percent greater battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.