Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is much better than nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 general score. Galaxy A50 is a incredibly lighter and notably thinner phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, even though both were only released with a couple of months difference. Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 8 GB more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a screen that's just as good as the Samsung Galaxy A50 one, because although the nubia Red Magic 3S has a just a little lower pixel density, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, it also counts with a bit larger display. The nubia Red Magic 3S has a much better camera than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same diafragm aperture, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a way better video quality, a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution back facing camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking much better quality photographs.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a bit more memory for applications, games, photos and videos than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is not only the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others, making it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.