Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-09-02 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.64 x 3.07 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Sonic silver |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 579.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 600 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.32 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 5S's 76.2 overall score. Samsung Galaxy A50's design is notably thinner and way lighter than nubia Red Magic 5S, even though it was released about 18 months before. Nubia Red Magic 5S counts with a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite worse screen pixel density, and they both have the same exact 1080 x 2340px resolution, the nubia Red Magic 5S also counts with a little larger display.
The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 cores, the nubia Red Magic 5S also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Nubia Red Magic 5S features a way better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not so good for capturing photographs or video in low light situations, it also counts with a camera in the back with much more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor which provides a lot better image and video quality and a much higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than nubia Red Magic 5S, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The nubia Red Magic 5S counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.