Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.49 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4200mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2's 79.7 general score. Galaxy A50 is an older phone than the OPPO Find X2, but Samsung was able to make it lighter and just a little thinner anyway. The OPPO Find X2 has a sharper screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a quite bigger screen, a higher screen density and a better 1440 x 3168 resolution.
Galaxy A50 features slightly more memory to install applications and games than OPPO Find X2, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The OPPO Find X2 counts with just a little better performance than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 also has more RAM memory.
The OPPO Find X2 has a better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Find X2 also has a way larger sensor taking much better quality pictures and videos, a way higher (4K) video quality and a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera. The OPPO Find X2 features a little longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.