Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has a score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's global score of 77.7. Galaxy A50 is a a little lighter phone than the OPPO Find X2 Neo, but both of them are 0.3inches thick. OPPO Find X2 Neo has a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400, a little bit better number of pixels in each inch in the display and a little bigger screen. Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit more storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has only 128 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X2 Neo's battery lifetime is very similar to the battery performance in Samsung Galaxy A50, although the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has 4025mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Neo captures much clearer photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have a F1.7 aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a much more megapixels back facing camera, a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way larger back camera sensor.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.