Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-05-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.50 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Ocean |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Ceramic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 519 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4260mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the OPPO Find X2 Pro, with a score of 83.8 against 83.1. The Galaxy A50 is an older device than OPPO Find X2 Pro, but it is lighter and thinner anyway. OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a little larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3168 resolution and a greater quantity of pixels per inch in the screen.
The OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a way bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 384 GB more internal memory. The OPPO Find X2 Pro has a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has more RAM.
OPPO Find X2 Pro counts with a little better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 4260mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. The OPPO Find X2 Pro shoots better photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same aperture, the OPPO Find X2 Pro also has a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot more MP back facing camera and a lot higher video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.