Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-04-14 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Galactic Silver and Starlight Black |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 975.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SDM865 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is much better than the OPPO Find X3 Neo, getting an 83.8 score against 76. Even though the Galaxy A50 is older than OPPO Find X3 Neo, it's design is just a bit thinner and a little bit lighter. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a brighter screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a bit higher pixels count per display inch, a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels and a bit larger screen.
OPPO Find X3 Neo counts with a little faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Find X3 Neo also has 8 GB more RAM. Galaxy A50 has a little bit better storage capacity for games and applications than OPPO Find X3 Neo, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
OPPO Find X3 Neo shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography and videos, it also counts with a back camera with lot more megapixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition. The OPPO Find X3 Neo has a bit superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 13% more battery capacity.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy A50 is also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.