Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's 77 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a a little lighter cellphone than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, but they are equally thin. OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a bit better processor than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has 8 GB more RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a little bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because it has a little bigger screen, a quite greater count of pixels per inch of display and a quite better resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a lot better (4K) video definition and a camera in the back with way more MP.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better memory for applications and games than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has just 128 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 has a much better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.