Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12, 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-12-03 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.88 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Galaxy A13 5G, with a score of 83.8 against 82.1. Galaxy A50's design is lighter and somewhat thinner than Galaxy A13 5G, even though it was released 3 years before. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a brighter display than Galaxy A13 5G, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340 and a greater pixel amount in each inch in the screen.
The Galaxy A50 has a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A13 5G. Both have 8 CPU cores and 4 GB of RAM memory. Galaxy A13 5G has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not good for shooting photographs or videos in low-light situations, and they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Galaxy A13 5G also counts with a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy A13 5G, because it has an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 64 GB more internal memory capacity. The Galaxy A13 5G counts with better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.