Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-12-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.30 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue Black and Light Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 200.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 6100+ (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than Galaxy A15 5G, having an 83.8 score against 77.4. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is an noticeably older cellphone than Galaxy A15 5G, but Samsung was able to make it just a little bit thinner and somewhat lighter. The Galaxy A15 5G counts with a bit better looking display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit inferior quantity of pixels per inch in the display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a little bit larger screen.
Galaxy A15 5G counts with just a bit bigger storage to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A15 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy A50 has a much better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A15 5G. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM.
Samsung Galaxy A15 5G has better battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy A15 5G shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for capturing photographs or video in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same video quality, the Galaxy A15 5G also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy A50 is a bit more expensive than the Galaxy A15 5G, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.