Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, having a overall score of 83.8 against 76.2. Galaxy A50's construction is lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. The Galaxy A16 5G features a little more vivid display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a just a bit inferior pixel count per inch of display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Galaxy A16 5G also counts with a bit bigger display.
Galaxy A16 5G counts with a slightly bigger storage for apps and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A16 5G also has a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 1000 GB. Galaxy A50 features a very superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G. Both have the same number of cores and the same RAM memory amount.
The Galaxy A50 shoots clearer photos and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a much less mega-pixels camera, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture. Galaxy A16 5G has longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
The Galaxy A50 is not only the best phones of the ones we compare here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.