Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A22 5G is slightly better than the Galaxy A50, getting an 84.6 score against 83.8. Galaxy A22 5G is a extremely newer cellphone than Galaxy A50, although it's somewhat heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy A22 5G features a display that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy A50 one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has a quite lower pixels density, it also counts with a bit bigger screen and a bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit better processor than Galaxy A22 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM. Galaxy A50 features just a bit more storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with more internal storage.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for shooting images in low light environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G counts with greater battery lifetime than Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.