Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, getting an 83.8 score against 79.9. Galaxy A50's design is a little thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, even though it was released 5 years before. The Galaxy A25 5G counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a quite worse display pixels density, and they both have the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy A25 5G also counts with a little larger display.
Samsung Galaxy A25 5G has a little bit better storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A25 5G also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A50 has a way better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A25 5G features longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery size. Galaxy A25 5G shoots a bit better videos and photos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is worse for low light captures and videos, it also counts with a bigger back camera sensor, a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a way higher (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.