Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 13 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | -- |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 MT6877V (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2600 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MC4 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than the Galaxy A34, getting a general score of 83.8 against 82.9. The Samsung Galaxy A50 and the Galaxy A34 count with similar displays, because although the Galaxy A34 has a bit worse pixel count per screen inch, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen and a slightly better 1080 x 2400px resolution.
Galaxy A50 features a much better memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy A34, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy A34 features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A50. They have the same RAM amount and the same number of cores.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A34, because although it has a back camera with a lot worse resolution and a way tinier sensor which provides a lot lower image and video quality, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low light environments.
Galaxy A34 counts with greater battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.