Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G's overall score of 79.4. Galaxy A50's construction is much lighter and a little bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, even though it was released 5 years before. Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit lower display density, and they both have the same exact resolution of 1080 x 2340, the Samsung Galaxy A35 5G also counts with a quite larger display.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, and although they both have equal internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with a really superior processing power than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores.
The Galaxy A35 5G features improved battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh. Galaxy A35 5G counts with a better camera than Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not so good for taking photographs and/or video in low light environments, it also counts with a way bigger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality videos and photos, a way better (4K) video quality and a camera with a much better 50 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.