Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| 2019-03-15 | 2018-05-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.90 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Blue, Gold and Lavender |
| Plastic | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 109.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1480 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 294 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7884 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T830 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.44 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 is much better than Galaxy A6, with a score of 83.8 against 75.8. The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a a little bit heavier phone than the Galaxy A6, but both are equally thin. The Galaxy A50 has a more vivid display than Galaxy A6, because it has a bit larger display, a way higher 1080 x 2340 resolution and a better display density.
The Galaxy A50 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A50 also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy A50 shoots just a bit better photos and videos than Galaxy A6, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a 0.36 inches sensor, a F1.7 aperture and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A50 also has a back-facing camera with a lot higher 25 mega pixels resolution.
Galaxy A50 has a very superior storage for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 features greater battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A6, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity instead of 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy A50 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A6, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A6. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Galaxy A50, else you can save some money and buy the Samsung Galaxy A6, giving up some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.