Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW is much better than the Galaxy A50, having a global score of 92.9 against 83.8. Galaxy A71 5G UW's body is newer than the Galaxy A50's, although it's a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with just a little better processing power than Galaxy A50, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy A71 5G UW and Samsung Galaxy A50 count with incredibly similar displays, because although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a bit bigger screen. Galaxy A71 5G UW shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for capturing photos in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a much more megapixels back camera and a lot larger camera sensor capturing much higher quality videos and photos.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW also has a SD card slot that admits up to 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a bit better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW is a better device, it is way more expensive than Galaxy A50, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Galaxy A50. If you are trying to save some money, you can get the Galaxy A50, and give up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.