Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | -- |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.38 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.27 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is slightly better than the Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, getting a score of 83.8 against 80.5. The Samsung Galaxy A50 body has the same thickness than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, but it is just a bit lighter. Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a way better performance than Samsung Galaxy A73 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Galaxy A73 5G has a little sharper display than Galaxy A50, because although it has a little worse pixel quantity per display inch, it also counts with a bit larger display and a bit higher 1080 x 2400 resolution. The Galaxy A73 5G has a slightly bigger storage capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy A50, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy A73 5G also has a SD extension slot that holds up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A73 5G counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery size. The Galaxy A73 5G takes a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a back camera with a much better resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.