Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 12 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2022-03-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.52 x 3.03 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | -- |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Aqua Blue and Forest Green |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2408 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.14 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F23 has a global score of 84.6, which is a bit better than the Galaxy A50's general score of 83.8. Although the Galaxy F23 is a little thicker than Galaxy A50, it's incredibly lighter and much newer. The Galaxy A50 has a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy F23. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy F23 features a display that is just as good as Galaxy A50's screen, because although the Samsung Galaxy F23 has a little bit lower pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a little bit bigger display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2408px. The Galaxy A50 has a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy F23, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A50 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 512 GB.
Galaxy A50 shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy F23, because although it has a back camera with much less mega-pixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture. Samsung Galaxy F23 has better battery performance than Galaxy A50, because it has a 25 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.