Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 403 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy F62 has a score of 88.1, which is just a bit better than Galaxy A50's 83.8 general score. The Samsung Galaxy F62 design is newer than Galaxy A50's, but it is somewhat thicker and heavier. Galaxy F62's CPU is just as good as Galaxy A50's CPU, because although the Galaxy F62 has a lower number of cores (although faster), it also counts with a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit better screen than Galaxy A50, because although it has a bit worse screen pixel density, it also counts with a quite larger screen and a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2400. Galaxy F62 counts with just a bit more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A50, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal memory, the Galaxy F62 also has a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB.
Galaxy F62 shoots much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger back camera sensor which gives a lot better photo and video quality, a way higher 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with way more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 counts with a really longer battery life than Galaxy A50, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.