Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 7.0 Nougat |
| 2019-03-15 | 2017-06-20 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.17 x 3.10 x 0.32 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | MediaTek Helio P20 MT6757 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 16 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-T880 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3300mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is much better than the Galaxy J7 Max's 76.1 general score. The Galaxy A50 design is newer, a bit thinner and just a little lighter than Galaxy J7 Max. Samsung Galaxy J7 Max and Galaxy A50 both have quite similar CPUs, both have a 4 GB RAM and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy A50 has a little sharper display than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a quite higher display density, a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels and a little bit larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy A50 captures better photographs and videos than Galaxy J7 Max, and although they both have a same size aperture, the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a back-facing camera with a much better resolution.
Galaxy A50 counts with a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Galaxy A50 has better battery life than Samsung Galaxy J7 Max, because it has a 4000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.