Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 10 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2021-03-18 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.46 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 7.80 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, blue and white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | PLS |
| 403 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 S5E3830 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G52 MP1 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is slightly better than Galaxy M12's 80 score. Samsung Galaxy A50's body is lighter and way thinner than the Galaxy M12, despite of the fact that it was released 2 years before. Galaxy A50 counts with a much better display than Samsung Galaxy M12, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a way better 1080 x 2340 resolution and more pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy M12, because although it has a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB against 1 TB, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory. The Galaxy A50 has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy M12. They have the same RAM memory amount and 8 processing cores.
Galaxy M12 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy A50, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is worse for low light photos and video, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate, the Galaxy M12 also counts with a way more mega-pixels back facing camera.
The Galaxy M12 counts with a superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 50% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.