Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2019-03-15 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 202.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.1 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.27 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.12 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy M30, with an 83.8 score against 82.4. Although Samsung Galaxy A50 and Samsung Galaxy M30 were released only 0 months apart, Samsung Galaxy A50 is just a little bit lighter and a little bit thinner. Samsung Galaxy A50 has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have a same size screen, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a little bit higher resolution of 1080 x 2340px and a little greater screen density.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better performance than Galaxy M30, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processor. The Samsung Galaxy A50 takes much better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy M30, and although they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a larger back-facing camera sensor taking higher quality videos and pictures, a larger aperture to take better low-light images and a lot better 25 megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Galaxy M30's memory for apps and games is just as good as Galaxy A50's one, both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy M30 features longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy A50, because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.