Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 83.8 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| -- | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2019-03-15 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.86 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black, Blue, Coral and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 202.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| Super AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.1 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP3 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.14 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.12 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A50 has an overall score of 83.8, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Note 3's score of 81.2. Samsung Galaxy A50 is a incredibly newer device, and it is also just a bit lighter and just a bit thinner than Samsung Galaxy Note 3. Galaxy A50 and Samsung Galaxy Note 3 have really similar processing units, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has less cpu cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU.
Galaxy Note 3 features a little bit better display than Galaxy A50, although it has a little smaller display, a bit lower 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution and a just a little inferior pixels quantity in each inch of display. The Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have the same 30 frames per second video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Samsung Galaxy A50 also has a lot bigger aperture to take better low light photos and videos, a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution and a larger sensor.
The Galaxy A50 has a much greater memory capacity to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 3, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy A50 counts with superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Galaxy A50 not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also a lot cheaper, which makes buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.